Diff for "FAQ/cookdmore" - CBU statistics Wiki
location: Diff for "FAQ/cookdmore"
Differences between revisions 1 and 8 (spanning 7 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2016-01-19 10:33:46
Size: 653
Editor: PeterWatson
Comment:
Revision 8 as of 2016-01-19 10:38:07
Size: 672
Editor: PeterWatson
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:

Line 5: Line 3:
In addition to a cut-off of 1, Hair et al mention that some people also use 4/(N-k-1) as a threshold for Cook’s distance which gives a lower threshold than 1 (e.g. this is 4/(27-1-1) = 0.16 for k predictors and N points and we have 1 predictor and 27 points). A third threshold of 4/N is also mentioned (Bollen, Kenneth A.; and Jackman, Robert W. (1990); Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases, in Fox, John; and Long, J. Scott (eds.); Modern Methods of Data Analysis (pp. 257-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage) as a threshold which is 4/27 = 0.14 in the above example. In addition to a cut-off of 1, Hair et al mention that some people also use 4/(N-k-1) as a threshold for Cook’s distance which gives a lower threshold than 1 (e.g. this is 4/(27-1-1) = 0.16 for k predictors and N points with k=1 predictor and N=27 points). A third threshold of 4/N is also mentioned as a threshold in

Bollen, Kenneth A.; and Jackman, Robert W. (1990) Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases,

and also in

Fox, John and Long, J. Scott (eds.); Modern Methods of Data Analysis (pp. 257-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage   which gives 4/27 = 0.14 in the above example.

Thresholds for Cook's Distance

In addition to a cut-off of 1, Hair et al mention that some people also use 4/(N-k-1) as a threshold for Cook’s distance which gives a lower threshold than 1 (e.g. this is 4/(27-1-1) = 0.16 for k predictors and N points with k=1 predictor and N=27 points). A third threshold of 4/N is also mentioned as a threshold in

Bollen, Kenneth A.; and Jackman, Robert W. (1990) Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases,

and also in

Fox, John and Long, J. Scott (eds.); Modern Methods of Data Analysis (pp. 257-91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage

which gives 4/27 = 0.14 in the above example.

None: FAQ/cookdmore (last edited 2016-01-19 10:38:07 by PeterWatson)