122014-04-22 17:27:32PeterWatson112013-08-07 11:35:39PeterWatson102013-03-08 10:17:37localhostconverted to 1.6 markup92012-06-26 13:08:02PeterWatson82012-06-26 13:07:37PeterWatson72009-04-06 15:39:25PeterWatson62009-04-06 15:37:51PeterWatson52009-04-06 15:37:16PeterWatson42009-04-06 15:35:30PeterWatson32009-04-06 15:35:05PeterWatson22009-03-26 16:25:16PeterWatson12009-03-26 16:15:35PeterWatson

This paper suggests a way of using residuals to represent interaction terms to enable a stepwise (forward or backward) comparison of the interactions can be performed in SPSS. This overcomes the problem of having to have the main effects and any lower order interactions in a model, at all times, in a model with higher order interactions. For example the need for all models to contain main effects A and B when assessing the A x B interaction. The rationale for the above method uses the fact that an interaction is the extra information in a product over and above that given by the combination of terms comprising that interaction e.g. a Downs Syndrome (Yes/No) group x age interaction represents the differences in an outcome at a given age over and above that expected assuming age has the same relationship with outcome in both groups and a constant difference in outcome between the two groups (tested by fitting the interaction in a model already containing the main effects of age and group). Agresti (1996, pp 127-129) illustrates a backward elimination approach to comparing interactions in logistic regression. References Agresti, A. (1996) An introduction to categorical data analysis. Wiley:New York. Burrill, D. (1998). Modelling and interpreting interactions in multiple regression. [On-line]. Also available at: .